Editorial Policy

This policy explains the standards every TheJusGrow article is expected to meet. If you think we’ve fallen short of it, please tell us.

Our purpose

We publish practical, accurate explanations of what AI agents and related tools can do for ordinary people. An article earns its place only if it answers a real question better than the reader could easily find elsewhere. We don’t publish articles simply because a topic is trending or might attract search traffic.

Accuracy and sourcing

• Primary sources first. We rely on official product documentation, company announcements, government and regulator publications, court records and peer-reviewed research wherever possible. When we use journalism or secondary analysis, we say so.
• We link to our sources at the end of each article, so you can check them.
• We separate kinds of information. We try to make clear the difference between verified facts, claims made by a company about its own product, analysts’ opinions, our own editorial judgement, and speculation. Speculation is always labelled.
• We date volatile facts. Prices, plans, availability and features change often. We say when information was checked.
• No invented material. We don’t fabricate statistics, quotes, testimonials, benchmarks, experiences or experts. If we can’t support a claim, we leave it out or say it’s uncertain.

Testing versus documentation

Readers deserve to know whether we’ve used a product ourselves. Every article includes a “How we researched this” note:

• “Tested by TheJusGrow” means we used the product ourselves for the stated task, and we describe what we did, when, and on which plan or device.
• “Based on publicly documented capabilities” means our information comes from the company’s own documentation and other sources, not our own hands-on use.

We never describe documentation-based coverage as testing, and we never claim first-hand experience that didn’t happen.

How we use AI tools

We cover AI, and we use it — carefully and transparently.

AI tools may assist with research organisation, brainstorming, outlining, summarising source material, editing, grammar and data organisation. They may also help produce first drafts.

A human editor is responsible for everything we publish. That means a person decides what we cover, checks factual claims against sources, rewrites and edits the text, and approves publication. We don’t publish raw AI output, and we don’t mass-produce articles. If AI-generated images or graphics are used, we label them.

Independence

• Editorial decisions are made by our editorial team alone — which today means our founding editor.
• Advertisers, affiliate partners and sponsors have no say in what we cover or what we conclude, and don’t see articles before publication.
• We don’t accept payment for positive coverage, and we don’t accept free products on the condition of a favourable review. If we ever receive a product or service free of charge for review, we’ll say so in the article.
• Sponsored content, if we publish any, will be clearly labelled as sponsored and kept separate from editorial content.

See our affiliate and advertising disclosure for how we make money.

Reviews and comparisons

We avoid unsupported “best” claims. When we compare products, we explain our criteria, state whether the comparison is based on testing or documentation, and describe who a product suits and who should look elsewhere. We include limitations and privacy considerations, not just features.

Safety and responsibility

We write about scams, security and privacy to help readers protect themselves. We describe how threats work at a level that helps people recognise them, and we don’t publish operational instructions that would help someone commit fraud or attack systems.

We don’t give personal legal, financial or medical advice. Where those subjects come up, we explain the general picture and point to official or professional sources.

Updates and corrections

We review important articles periodically and when products change. When we make a substantial update, we change the “Updated” date. When we correct an error, we follow our corrections policy.

Headlines and images

Headlines should be accurate and specific, not clickbait. We don’t use fake urgency or exaggerated claims. We prefer original diagrams and graphics to generic stock imagery, and we only use screenshots and images we have the right to use.

Contact

Questions about this policy, or concerns about an article: please use our contact page.